Mohinder Mehta v. Ranjana Duggal

CRM-M-9299-2014 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9299-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 16, 2015 Mohinder Mehta ......Petitioner

Versus

Ranjana Duggal ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Abhishek Singh, Advocate for Mr.Salil Sablok, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Angel Sharma, Advocate for Mr.D.D.Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.

.......

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned proxy counsel states at bar that he has the instructions to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioner to take recourse before appropriate Forum at appropriate stage in accordance with law.

Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the above prayer.

MEENU 2015.09.17 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-9299-2014 (O&M) -2The present petition is disposed of with the permission aforesaid.

Learned Trial Court is directed to sympathetically consider the application, to be moved by the petitioner, for grant of exemption from personal appearance on each date of hearing. September 16, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.09.17 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh