Divya v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-50341 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 21, 2019 Divya

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Dishant D. Tuteja, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.934 dated 08.08.2018 under Sections 120-B, 323, 34, 452 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Jagadhri City, District Yamuna Nagar.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. The FIR in the present case has been registered under Sections 120-B, 323, 34, 452 and 506 IPC. The petitioner has already joined the investigation. Nothing is to be recovered from her. The petitioner is not VINEET GULATI 2019.02.22 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-50341 of 2018 -2required for custodial interrogation. No useful purpose will be served by sending and keeping the petitioner in custody till the disposal of the case. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case, where the petitioner is entitled to benefit of anticipatory bail. Therefore, the present petition is accepted and the order dated 16.11.2018 granting interim bail to the petitioner, is made absolute.

February 21, 2019 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2019.02.22 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh