Sudesh Kumar And Another v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRR-2598-2013 Date of Decision: 29.04.2022 Sudesh Kumar and another ......... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana ......... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. R.S. Chahal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Chirag Kundu, Advocate for the complainant. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the FIR in question has already been quashed on the basis of compromise by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.10.2020 passed in CRM-M-25933-2020 titled as Sudesh and another Versus State of Haryana and others.
Learned counsel for the complainant does not refute the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners.
Given above, the present petition disposed of having been infructuous. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 29.04.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.04.29 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document