Sushil And ANR. v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-49441-2017 Date of Decision: 27.03.2019 Sushil and another .... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

Present:

Mr. Bhupinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. RS Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. RK Makkar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ajay, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that the instant petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that the petitioners have been acquitted by the trial Court.

In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

March 27, 2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2019.03.29 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document