← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/50355/2018dismissed

Kulbir Singh v. State Of Haryana

2018-11-20Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-50355 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 20, 2018 Kulbir Singh @ Nikka

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.G.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sukhdeep Parmar, DAG, Haryana for the respondent-State.

Mr.Gurvinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the complainant **** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for grant of interim bail in case FIR No.121 dated 12.11.2015 under Sections 302, 341, 323 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Rori, District Sirsa.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant appeared and contested the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. At the time of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner VINEET GULATI 2018.11.21 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh prayed for grant of interim bail to the petitioner for making arrangements

CRM No.M-50355 of 2018 -2for the marriage of his adopted daughter, whereas, learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant contested this fact and argued that there is no document on record to show that Pardeep Kaur(bride) is adopted daughter of the petitioner. Even, in the marriage card, the petitioner has been shown as Uncle of Pardeep Kaur. As there is no document on record to show that Pardeep Kaur is adopted daughter of the petitioner, therefore, no ground is made for granting interim bail to him. There are other family members i.e. parents etc. for making arrangements. Furthermore, it has been brought to the notice of this Court that learned Sessions Judge, Sirsa, has already passed the order for attending of marriage by the petitioner in police custody on the date fixed. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

November 20, 2018 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2018.11.21 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh