Shakeel Haider v. State Of Haryana

2023:PHHC:106647 CRM-M-29141-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29141-2021 Date of Decision: 17.08.2023 Shakeel Haider ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT Present :

Mr. Saifuddin Shams, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. K.K.Chahal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent-State.

Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate, for the victim-N.K.Gupta.

Mr. Deepak Vashisth, Advocate, for the complainant-Parveen Gupta ***** RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present first petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.40 dated 02.03.2021 registered under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, at Police Station Mundkati, District Palwal. 2.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has joined the investigation. However, learned counsel for the State has submitted that despite having been granted three opportunities by the Trial Court and even five opportunities by this Court, which is reflected from the order sheet of this Court, as well, the petitioner has not cooperated VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2023.08.18 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

2023:PHHC:106647 CRM-M-29141-2021 with the Investigating Officer. The requisite documents, which the police require in connection with the case, have not been provided by the petitioner.

3.

In view of the above, this Court does not find it appropriate to continue the protection to the petitioner any more. 4.

Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. (RAJBIR SEHRAWAT) JUDGE 17.08.2023 adhikari Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2023.08.18 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh