Amod @ Laddu v. State Of Haryana

CRR-2641-2013 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-2641-2013 Date of Decision: January 27, 2016 Amod @ Laddu .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.C.R.Olla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Pawan Gaur, DAG, Haryana.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Om Parkash, Police Station, City, Hisar, has pointed out that learned trial Court has returned the verdict of guilt and the appropriate sentence has also been passed, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition without arguing the MEENU 2016.01.29 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRR-2641-2013 -2case on merits with permission to take all the pleas before learned appellate Court in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly.

January 27, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.01.29 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh