High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/26274/2022disposed of

Brijesh v. State Of Haryana

2022-09-01Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-26274-2022 (O & M) Date of decision: 01.09.2022 Smt. Brijesh ...... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

Present:

Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Himani Anand, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Nikhil Vats, Advocate for the complainant. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case bearing FIR No.105 dated 12.05.2022 under Sections 308, 506 read with Section 34 IPC registered at Police Station City Bahalgarh, District Sonipat, Haryana.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 13.06.2022 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

The learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation in terms of the order dated 13.06.2022 and is not required for custodial interrogation.

The learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the bail application. However, nothing specific was pointed out as to why the custodial interrogation of the petitioner was required. In this view of the matter, interim order dated 13.06.2022 is made absolute.

SUKHPREET KAUR 2022.09.02 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-26274-2022 (O & M) ::2::

However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and she shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

The petition stands disposed of.

September 01, 2022 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2022.09.02 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document