Sandeep Singh @ Shunty v. State Of Punjab
2023:PHHC:096106
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH 211-2 CRM-M-25401-2023 Date of Decision: 27.07.2023 Sandeep Singh @ Shunty ......... PeƟƟoner
Versus
State of Punjab ......... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Swarn Tiwana, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.
Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the complainant. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) FIR No.
Dated Police StaƟon SecƟons 04.10.2017 Daba, District Ludhiana 302, 307, 326, 452, 506, 148, 149 IPC The peƟƟoner incarcerated in the FIR capƟoned above, has come up before this Court under SecƟon 439 CrPC seeking bail.
2.
State counsel submits that the trial is at advance stage. 3.
The peƟƟoner's counsel submits that at this stage, they would be contended and saƟsfied if a direcƟon is given to the trial court to conclude the trial in a Ɵme-bound manner and further in case the trial is not completed by the given date, they are permiƩed to file a fresh bail peƟƟon on the grounds of delay in the trial, in addiƟon to the merits of the case.
4.
Given above, considering the peƟƟoners' custody, this court requests the concerned trial court to make all endeavours to conclude the trial by Sep 30, 2023, of which the prosecuƟon evidence be completed by Aug 31, 2023, and the remaining Ɵme to provide an opportunity to the accused to lead defence evidence, if so desired. It is clarified that this order expediƟng the trial is subject to the condiƟon that neither the peƟƟoner shall seek JYOTI 2023.07.28 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
any adjournment nor try to use any tacƟcs to delay the trial. If they do so, this order of
CRM-M-25401-2023 -22023:PHHC:096106 expediƟng the trial shall stand automaƟcally recalled by resorƟng to SecƟon 362, read with SecƟon 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, without any further reference to this court. However, if the trial is not completed by the date menƟoned above, and the delay is not aƩributable to the peƟƟoner, in that situaƟon, it shall be permissible for the peƟƟoner to file a bail peƟƟon by taking an addiƟonal ground of delay in the trial, and such peƟƟon may be filed before the trial court or this court. 4.
The peƟƟon is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty and observaƟons. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand closed.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 27.07.2023 JyoƟ-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2023.07.28 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.