Sunil Kumar @ Bulla v. State Of Punjab

 





    

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH   


Date of decision: 09.08.2022
           

 

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

 
 



 

   

     

    Mr. Tanvir Joshi, AAG Punjab. **** 
 



    !          " #  

# !$%&' () *+ +( *+** !   
 
  ,   -   . ,    
 */** *01   2'-
 /03)  4               #      

 ! & 

 !!55         " * 6!

  1 7 "2 /308  #1/)/ !   9 :3     2 #

 

    

    Learned State counsel contends that the petitioner has been MANGAL SINGH 2022.08.17 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

 






     involved in the present case on the disclosure statement of the co-accused. The petitioner is also involved in 07 other cases, out of which in two cases under the NDPS Act, the petitioner stands convicted. ;    <! 
 . 

!"
#$%

&# '
()&# .

  ' /++) *+** *+ = *+**   '-
         5     "   5   ! 
 !   #     ! 5      !

      5            #    !

  

#      #  7              "

5       5##<      !   
 . &# '
()&#*
1 2      !    !"%
+%,'> 

!"
&+-
.)    1*+*/2 (
.. /  " #        !!

!  #                " #       

             +=            '!

   !

     "#   

    

 












/ 
09.08.2022








    ?   @ !A  B@'   ?    #A   B@' MANGAL SINGH 2022.08.17 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment