Vipin v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 49725 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- February 15, 2018 Vipin

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.

*** Learned State counsel has contended that the petitioner has not joined the investigation in terms of the directions issued to him vide order dated 10.01.2018 and as a matter of fact the F.I.R. No. 23 dated 17.1.2018 for offences under Sections 302,307,342,148,149,120-B IPC and 27 of the Arms Act has been registered against him with Police Station Rajgarh. This fact is conceded by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Om Parkash.

Since the petitioner has not complied with the direction of joining the investigation issued vide last order, the petition cannot survive and is dismissed accordingly.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE February 15, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2018.02.16 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh