Suraj Pal @ Sanju v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 49730 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- March 19, 2018 Suraj Pal @ Sanju

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramandeep Sandhu, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

Mr. SPS Gill, Advocate for the complainant.

*** Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he be permitted to withdraw the petition, though he submits that a direction be issued to the trial Court to conclude the trial expeditiously.

Permission is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The trial Court is directed to conclude the trial by giving short adjournments preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order in the Court.

Learned counsel for the complainant and learned State counsel submit that they would make every effort to conclude the evidence of the prosecution at the earliest by causing appearance of the prosecution witnesses in the Court. In case of it being not so done, the petitioner may approach the Court again, as per law.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE March 19, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2018.03.19 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh