Mufti Mohd. Akhtar v. State Of Pb. And ORS.
Daily Lok Adalat Bench No.4 CWP-802-2007 (O&M) Mufti Mohd.Akhtar Vs. The State of Punjab and others Present:- None for the petitioner.
Mr.Harsimran Singh Harry, Advocate for Mr.Ghulam Nabi Malik, Advocate for respondent No.4. *** Vakalatnama has been filed by counsel for the respondent No.4 today, which is taken on record. He has stated that the petitioner has since expired.
Notice issued to the petitioner has also been received back with the report that he has since died.
Relief claimed in the writ petition was personal to the petitioner regarding selection of respondent No.5 as Mufti. In view of the death of the petitioner, the writ petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of as such. Copy of this order be supplied/sent to the counsel/parties. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (JASBIR SINGH) PRESIDENT (L.N.MITTAL) MEMBER 01.07.2026 Meenu MEENU KUMARI 2026.07.02 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment