Hardayal Singh v. Birbal & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRR-2959-2013 Reserved on 13.09.2022 Pronounced on: 30.09.2022 Hardayal Singh ......... Petitioner

Versus

Birbal and others ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Sullar, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Rajat Gautam, D.A.G., Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 12.12.2000 City Sirsa 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC Criminal Appeal no.

No.102/104-CRA of 2011/2012 Date of Decision: 24.07.2013 Disagreed by the imposition of sentence, terminate as on the lesser side, the complainant had come up before this Court for its enhancement by filing the present criminal revision petition.

The convict had also filed a separate criminal revision petition challenging his conviction which was listed as CRR No. 2594 of 2013 vide an out of Court compromise, the parties had come settled all their disputes and consequently, a quashing petition was filed in CRR-2594 of 2013 which is being allowed by a separate order passed in the said case. Since based on the compromise between the present petitioner and convict Gurmail Singh, his conviction has been set aside and he has been acquitted, as such, the present petition seeking enhancement of the sentence rendered infructuous. Given above, the present petition stands disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 30.09.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
JYOTI 2022.10.01 02:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document