High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/5733/2022disposed of

Tannu And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

2022-06-13Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao2 pages

CRWP-5733-2022 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5733-2022 Date of Decision: 13.06.2022 Tannu and another . . . . Petitioners Vs.

State of Haryana and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO **** Present: - Mr.Deepak Kumar Bartia, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J. (ORAL) Petitioners seek protection of their life and liberty as they apprehend danger at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 7 and other relatives because they have solemnised marriage on 10.06.2022 against the wishes of said respondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioners identifies the petitioners on the basis of documents attached. It is contended that petitioners are major, their dates of birth being 17.12.2003 and 30.08.2000, respectively. Aadhar cards and Secondary Examination Certificates of both the petitioners are appended with the petition as Annexures P1 & P2 and Annexures P3 & P4, respectively. Marriage certificate and the photographs of marriage are on record as Annexures P5 and P6. It is submitted that there is no impediment to the marriage of the petitioners. Petitioners, it is stated, submitted representation dated 09.06.2022 (P7) to respondent No.2 i.e., the Superintendent of Police, Sonipat, for redressal of their grievance but no action has been taken thereon.

VIVEK PAHWA 2022.06.14 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-5733-2022 -2Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3.

Mr.Vikrant Pamboo, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Advance copy of the petition stands served. Without commenting upon the age of the petitioners or validity of their marriage or validity and genuineness of the certificates/documents appended with the petition, respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Sonipat is directed to look into representation dated 09.06.2022 (P7) submitted by the petitioners and take appropriate action if any/as may be required, keeping in view the threat perception to the petitioners.

Petition is disposed of accordingly.

13.06.2022 (M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO) JUDGE

1. Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No

2. Whether reportable?

Yes/No VIVEK PAHWA 2022.06.14 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document