Smriti Sharma And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS




    
    

 Date of decision: 26th May, 2015  Smriti Sharma and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others  Respondents     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.

None for respondents No.4 and 5.

 "
#$ !% Learned State counsel has placed on record reply on behalf of the official respondents, whereby statements of the petitioners were recorded before the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ambala and detailed in the reply by way of affidavit of Pankhuri Kumar, HPS, Asstt. Commissioner of Police, Ambala, reflects that the threat perception to lives and personal liberty of the petitioners no more subsists.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.28 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the petition stands disposed off having been rendered infructuous.

However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court in case any such eventuality so arises. $  "
%   &'#


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.28 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court