Vikas Yadav v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25399-2024 Date of Decision: 15.07.2024 Vikas Yadav ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Naveen Kumar Kuhad, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. AG, Haryana.

***** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 26.09.2023 Faridabad, Old District Faridabad 379A r/w 34 IPC The petitioner incarcerated upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court seeking bail under Section 439 CrPC. 2.

In para 9 of the petition, the petitioner has mentioned the following criminal history:- Sr. No.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 12.07.2023 Faridabad Central, 379-A IPC District Faridabad 3.

However, counsel for the State on instructions submits that except the above mentioned criminal history, petitioner is also involved in FIR No.3879/2023 registered in Police Station Chhawla Delhi, which he has not mentioned. 4.

At this stage, petitioner's counsel seeks withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a fresh by mentioning all criminal cases pending anywhere in India including status thereof.

5.

Given above, petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. It is clarified that power of attorney filed in the ANJU RANI 2024.07.17 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-11621-2024 -2present case shall suffice and there shall be no need to file fresh power of attorney in the fresh petition, if filed and Registry shall not raise any objection. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 15.07.2024 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/no Whether reportable?

Yes/no ANJU RANI 2024.07.17 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh