High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/8558/2016dismissed

Manmohan Singh v. M/S Gupta Roller Flaur Mills

2016-04-22Mr. Justice S.P. Bangarh2 pages

CRM-M 8558/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:22.04.2016 Manmohan Singh .............Petitioner v.

M/s Gupta Roller Flour Mills .............Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.Harkaran Singh,Advocate for Mr.BS Bhalla,Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Kirat Singh Sidhu,DAG Punjab with ASI Iqbal Singh Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral) This Court vide order dated 15.3.2016 had passed the following conditional order:- "Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in complaint case No.RT-68/26-10-12/1-2-9 NACT-0600657/2009 031001016892009 titled M/s Gupta Roller Flour Mills v Manmohan Flour Mills and another under Sections 138,139 read with Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881.

For the non-appearance of the petitioner on 5.3.2015 his bail bonds were cancelled and NBWs issued vide order dated 14.10.2015.

It is contended that matter has been amicably settled and the petitioner is ready RAJINDER PRASHAD JOSHI 2016.04.22 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh.

CRM-M 8558/2016 and willing to deposit the remaining sum of Rs.2.50 lacs.

Notice of motion for 5.4.2016.

In the event of petitioner surrendering before the trial court and depositing a sum of Rs.2.50 lacs within 15 days from today,he shall be released on interim bail by the trial court to its satisfaction.

To be shown in the urgent list."

On the previous date none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner and therefore, ASI Iqbal Singh,present in Court was directed to verify regarding surrender of the petitioner alongwith deposit of the said amount.

At the time of hearing today,learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client has furnished no instructions regarding compliance of the order dated 15.3.2016. Learned State counsel on instructions submits that although the amount was not deposited in Court, it appears that parties have arrived at some amicable settlement.

In view of the above,present petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be entitled to seek his remedy independently of this order in case he has settled the matter with the complainant.

22.04.2016 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge RAJINDER PRASHAD JOSHI 2016.04.22 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh.