Vinod v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-9711-2015 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-9711-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 17, 2015 Vinod @ Kaika

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, Addl. AG, Haryana, for the respondent.

Mr. Karan Pathak, Advocate, for the informant.

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) Learned counsel submits that most of the prosecution witnesses have been examined before learned Trial Court, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with permission to file a fresh petition before learned Trial Court in view of changed circumstances.

Learned counsel for the State as well as counsel for the informant, has no objection to the above prayer. Dismissed as withdrawn.

In case the petitioner moves an application for grant of bail before learned Trial Court within a month of passing of this order, the same shall be decided as expeditiously as possible. (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE August 17, 2015 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.08.19 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document