Sugna @ Sugana And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4475-2026 Date of Decision: 20.04.2026 SUGNA @ SUGANA AND ANR

...Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA ****

Present:

Mr. Dhawal Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioners. MANISHA BATRA , J. (ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 17 and to take action on their representation dated 17.04.2026 (Annexure P-9). 2.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 17.04.2026 (Annexure P-9) before the Superintendent of Police, Sirsa raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Sirsa to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon.

3.

Notice of motion.

HARISH KUMAR 2026.04.20 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRWP-4475-2026 -24.

Ms. Himani Arora, learned DAG, Haryana, has advance notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day.

5.

In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 17.04.2026 (Annexure P-9) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty.

(MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE April 20, 2026 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.04.20 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment