Kapoor Singh v. State Of Haryana And ANR

CWP-21508-2008 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 272-2 IOIN-1-CWP-21508-2008 CWP-21508-2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.08.2025 KAPOOR SINGH

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Sandeep Dhull, Advocate for Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG Haryana assisted by Ct. Sandeep 851/HSR office of ADGP Hisar Range Hisar *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 15.12.2008 (Annexure P-2) whereby he was ordered to compulsorily retire as per Rule 9.18(2) of Punjab Police Rules, 1934 as applicable to State of Haryana.

2.

The impugned order was passed on 15.12.2008. The notice was issued, however, there was no stay in favour of the petitioner, thus, impugned order was implemented and petitioner was made to retire on attaining age of 55 years.

3.

The petitioner was made to retire on attaining the age of 55 years and his service was pensionable, thus, he must have received DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.08.22 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-21508-2008 (O&M) -2pension which is 50% of last drawn salary. He had not worked during said period. Thus, at this stage, this Court does not find it appropriate to set aside orders whereby petitioner was made to retire. 4.

Dismissed.

5.

Pending application(s) if any, also stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 21.08.2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.08.22 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document