Rajinder Singh v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M-21445-2026 -1-
!
"#$# %& ' ()
& *+ ,- ,,
, ).
+/& !
"#$ % & ' ( ( $)$* + ,%'
-. & ( & /0' *$ )# )* $)$1 223+$.
22#+2.
$41 *32+*.
242+*. 24)% &'&& $)$*+ ,%'
-. 5 6
$ )1 )* $)$1 %
78 7 9 :
:
7 : :
; 7
( ( 7 7 : 7 :
: 8 %:
0
<
5
: ; 7 &
CRM-M-21445-2026 -2- 7 7 7 :
:
!
8 :
: 7: : & :
: : ( !
8 5
(:: 7 = & 7 * /0 :& 7 & 2> )* $)$1 : && ?
5 6 : <: ? 7 & & & : 7 "
0 & &7 @ /0 : 7& 7
7 & 7 ' & 8 0
A & ; & A 7
CRM-M-21445-2026 -3- & ' : & 0 :
& 8 6 ( 7& :: (
7 : : /
7 7 0 : This Court has heard the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties at considerable length. 7.
The petitioner is alleged to have formed membership of an unlawful assembly with the co-accused and in prosecution of common object thereof, is further alleged to have assaulted the complainant and other victims. The injuries which have been sustained by the complainant and other victims, have been opined to be simple in nature. A cross case is also stated to have been registered against the complainant party on the statement of the father of the petitioner. Given the nature of the allegations as levelled against the petitioner, the part attributed to him, the fact that the subject offences are triable by Magistrate and except the offences under Sections 118(1) of BNS, all other offences are bailable in nature, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. Even otherwise, he had been directed to join the investigation by the Court of
CRM-M-21445-2026 -4Sessions also and he had even joined the same but his application was dismissed only on account of non-recovery of the weapon of offence. It is well settled that 7 & & & <
? ,
!- ," # # $
%# &$ !( ? 8 B
: 0 ; : 2) & 7 &B:
B 0 0 ; 7 C & C & "#$+$.%'
# 0 7 & 8 7 &7 ? 7 : &
7 : &
0, 1 ' ()