← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaLPA/1432/2025disposed of

Dharampal v. State Of Haryana And Others

2025-09-09Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,Mr. Justice Vikas Suri2 pages

LPA-1432-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH (109) LPA-1432-2025 Date of Decision : September 09, 2025 Dharampal .. Appellant

Versus

The State of Haryana and others .. Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI

Present:

Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Anu Pal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, Advocate, for respondents No. 3 to 5. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though the writ petition being CWP No.8007 of 2025 has been dismissed on the ground that the same involves the disputed question of facts with liberty to avail civil remedy but the prayer of the appellant is that a representation dated 03.02.2025 (Anneuxre P-13) has already been submitted by the appellant and the appellant will be satisfied in case a time bound direction is issued to respondent No.2-The Director, Urban Local Bodies, Urban Estate, Panchkula, Haryana to decide the said representation by passing an appropriate speaking order.

HARSHA RANI 2025.09.11 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

LPA-1432-2025 2.

Notice of motion.

3.

Ms. Anu Pal, learned Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 3 to 5.

4.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case the representation dated 03.02.2025 (Annexure P-13) has been received by the respondent No.2-The Director, Urban Local Bodies, Urban Estate, Panchkula, Haryana and the same is still pending consideration, appropriate order on the said representation will be passed by respondent No.2 within a period of eight weeks from the receipt of copy of this order by giving due opportunity of hearing to the appellant as well as the Municipal Corporation. 5.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondents, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 6.

Ordered accordingly.

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE September 09, 2025 (VIKAS SURI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.09.11 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document