Sameena Khan And Another v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-50930 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 21, 2018 Sameena Khan and another

...Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Gurmeet Singh Saini, Advocate for Mr.J.S.Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Pawan Sharda, Sr.DAG, Punjab for the respondent-State.

Mr.Kulbhushan Raheja, Advocate for the complainant.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.150 dated 13.09.2018 under Section 174-A IPC, registered at Police Station City-I, Abohar, District Fazilka.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant appeared and contested the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. The petitioners have already joined the investigation. They are VINEET GULATI 2018.12.21 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh not required for custodial interrogation. Nothing is to be recovered from

CRM No.M-50930 of 2018 -2them. No useful purpose will be served by sending the petitioners to custody.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case, where petitioners are entitled to benefit of anticipatory bail. Therefore, the present petition is accepted and the order dated 22.11.2018 granting interim bail to the petitioners, is made absolute.

December 21, 2018 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2018.12.21 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh