Vinod Bhati v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29692-2021 Date of decision: 21.02.2022 Vinod Bhati

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another




 



   



 
        
 
    !


" 
 
  #!     $
%
      

        &             #!

  %'
()
%(%* !#  +    &  , #
 - !      .       .     %/
('
%(%*#   0 . 

"Case has been taken up for hearing through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though no notice was received from respondent No.2 to make appearance before Proper Officer, however, petitioner on his own had gone to the office of respondent No.2 (Proper Officer) and joined the inquiry. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for respondent No.2 has given concurrence to above said MANGAL SINGH 2022.02.22 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-29692-2021 /2/ fact and further submits that petitioner has co-operated during the course of inquiry and the Department do not require custody of petitioner as till date there is no arrest authorization of petitioner.

Adjourned to 28.09.2021."

- !     #      

 #   $
%1 2
" 

#       .!!       2   2 
 3%/
('
%(%*  1  2 #      .  # ! !   $
%
 4 .        1  2       2 !.     concerned department does not require his custody, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner that he will continue        2 .!!     #

 !!# !    #!     Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions as envisaged in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

It is made clear that if pursuant to and in compliance with this order, the petitioner does not cooperate with the inquiry proceedings, the concerned department would be at liberty to move an appropriate application for cancellation of bail.

%*
(%
%(%%    

   


5   6  7 86$ 5    #!7 86$ MANGAL SINGH 2022.02.22 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document