Rahul v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-29848-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:-5.8.2022 Rahul ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Rajesh Dhankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana.

***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition at this stage. In view of the aforesaid request, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage with liberty to file afresh in case there is inordinate delay in conclusion of the trial.

However, keeping in view the fact that as on date 17 out of cited 24 PWs have been examined and while also bearing in mind the long custody of the petitioner, this Court deems it appropriate to issue the following directions:

(i) The trial Court shall frame a schedule of dates in advance for summoning the witnesses and shall also endeavour to PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.08.05 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

( 2 ) CRM-M-29848-2021 (O&M) record the statements of the PWs whose presence is duly secured. Special Messengers be deputed for securing the presence of the PWs. If deemed necessary, a letter may be written to the Senior Superintendent of Police, concerned, for getting the needful done for ensuring timely presence of PWs.

(ii) The prosecution is directed to ensure the presence of all the PWs before the trial Court on the dates as may be fixed by the trial Court for recording prosecution evidence. The District Attorney concerned to take necessary steps for the purpose of securing the presence of the remaining PWs. 5.8.2022 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj/sanjay Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.08.05 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document