Pawan Rana v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-5046 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 21, 2017 Pawan Rana

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Abhinav Kalia Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0448 dated 29.12.2016 under Sections 148, 323, 325, 506 read with Section 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Baldev Nagar, District Ambala.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. The petitioner has already joined the investigation. He is not required for any investigation or interrogation purposes. The FIR is only under sections 323, 325, 148, 506 read with Section 149 IPC. The trial of Vineet Gulati 2017.04.27 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-5046 of 2017 -2the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by sending the petitioner to custody.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case, where the petitioners are entitled to benefit of grant of anticipatory bail. Therefore, the present petition is accepted and the order dated 16.02.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute. April 21, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.04.27 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh