Sonu @ Apwinder Singh And ANR. v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-5089 of 2017 Date of Decision: 26.04.2017 Sonu @ Apwinder Singh and another

...Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. K.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the complainant.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ajaib Singh submits that police after investigation has deleted the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. Offences punishable under Sections 279 and 427 IPC are bailable and this application seeking anticipatory bail is not maintainable.

In view of submission of learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.

Learned counsel for the complainant at this stage submits that from facts of the case as narrated in FIR, offence under Section 307 IPC is attracted.

The complainant has other legal remedies to avail in this regard and will be at liberty to avail the same.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) April 26, 2017 JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.04.26 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH