Vandana And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRWP-5816-2022 Date of Decision: 16.06.2022 Vandana and another . . . . Petitioners Vs.
State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO Present: - Mr. Jaspreet Singh Brar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
**** M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J. (ORAL) Petitioners seek protection of their life and liberty as they apprehend danger at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 7 as they are living in a live-in-relationship against the wishes of said respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners identifies the petitioners on the basis of documents attached. It is contended that petitioners are major, their dates of birth being 20.01.2003 and 07.10.2002, respectively. Aadhar cards of both the petitioners are appended with the petition as Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively. They alleged that there is a threat to their life and liberty from respondents No.4 to 7, and in this regard they have submitted representation (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar, for redressal of their grievance but no action has been taken thereon.
Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana , accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Advance copy of the petition stands served. VIVEK PAHWA 2022.06.17 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-5816-2022 -2In view of the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar is directed to dispose of representation (Annexure P-3) submitted by the petitioners, and take appropriate action if any/as may be required, keeping in view the alleged threat perception to the petitioners. Petition is disposed of accordingly.
June 16, 2022 (M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No Whether reportable?
Yes/No VIVEK PAHWA 2022.06.17 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document