High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/5244/2017disposed of

Preeti And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

2017-02-16Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-5244-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-5244 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : February 16, 2017 Preeti and another ... Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Petitioners in person with Mr. D.S. Nigha, Advocate.

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 to 7, mother, brothers and other relative of petitioner No.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 14.02.2017 (Annexure P-5) made by the petitioners. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner No.1-Preeti is 11.02.1998 as per copy of Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-1) and that of petitioner No.2-Amanpreet Singh is 04.08.1994 as per copy of Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-2). They got married on 14.02.2017. Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-4.

In view of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2Superintendent of Police, Karnal to look into the representation dated Sachin Mehta 2017.02.16 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-5244-2017 -214.02.2017 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office. However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them. (SURINDER GUPTA) February 16, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.02.16 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH