Pargat Singh v. State Of Punjab

106+211

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-2138 of 2017 in/and CRM-M-526 of 2017 Date of Decision: 27.01.2017 Pargat Singh ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr. Jagmeet Singh Moudgill, Advocate, for the petitioner.



   *** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

CRM-2138 of 2017 This is an application for making correction in the headnote, para No.3 as well as in the prayer clause of the petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertence Section 325 of IPC could not be written in the petition. Heard.

For the reasons, mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Registry is directed to make necessary correction, accordingly. CRM-M-526 of 2017 Petitioner-Pargat Singh has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in case Parveen Kumar 2017.01.27 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Chandigarh

CRM-2138 of 2017 in/and CRM-M-526 of 2017 /2/ FIR No.128 dated 05.10.2016, registered at Police Station Chhajali, District Sangrur, under Sections 323, 341, 148 and 149 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 308 and 325 of Indian Penal Code, added later on. Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the instant petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and gone through the record. From the record, I find that grievous injury No.1 which is on the shoulder of son of complainant has been attributed to the present petitioner. Injury No.6 which has been declared dangerous to life has not been attributed to the present petitioner.

The petitioner has been in custody since 09.10.2016. He is not required for any investigation or interrogation purposes as he is in judicial custody. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the final disposal of the case. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds in the sum of
50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. 27.01.2
 

           



        !

Parveen Kumar 2017.01.27 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Chandigarh