High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/528/2017allowed

Sarita @ Nanhi v. State Of Haryana

2017-03-02Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

CRM-M-528-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-528-2017 Date of Decision:- 02.03.2017 Sarita @ Nanhi ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. S.S. Virk, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 12.01.2017 of this Court, the petitioner was directed to appear/surrender before the learned trial Court and the trial Court was required to admit him to interim bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated 12.01.2017 of this Court, the petitioner has already appeared/surrendered and bail & surety bonds furnished by her, in pursuance of the pointed order of this Court, were attested and accepted by the trial Court.

Naresh Kumar 2017.03.08 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-528-2017 -2Considering the fact that the petitioner has appeared before the trial Court, the order dated 12.01.2017 passed by this Court is hereby made absolute and accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. However, the petitioner shall be bound by the conditions imposed by the trial Court.

March 02, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2017.03.08 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh