Hardeep Singh v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-51405 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 29, 2018 Hardeep Singh

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Saurabh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

CRM No.41120 of 2018 The application is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Annexures P-1 to P-3 are taken on record.

CRM No.M-51405 of 2018 Petitioner has filed this third petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.72 dated 23.04.2018 under Sections 323, 324, 325, 326, 114, 506/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Ismailabad, District Kurukshetra.

Notice of motion.

Mr.Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana, has put in appearance on VINEET GULATI 2018.11.30 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh behalf of the respondent-State and Mr.Siddharth Pandit, Advocate has

CRM No.M-51405 of 2018 -2appeared and filed Power of Attorney on behalf the complainant and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that the present petitioner is named in the FIR and he is stated to be armed with iron cutter. He gave injuries on the thumb of left hand and also on the neck of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that grievous injuries is on the thumb of left hand and injury on the neck is stated to be simple. The perusal of the FIR shows that it has been registered under Sections 326 IPC etc. The petitioner has been in custody since 16.08.2018. He is not required for any investigation or interrogation purposes as he is in judicial custody. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the disposal of the case.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. November 29, 2018 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2018.11.30 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh