Gobind Ram And ANR. v. Krishan Lal And Others
!
"#
!$%&%"'( ))*
+
)
,- ..
-
+-/
,- ..
-
+(
0 . +) -
-1 -
!"
"
#$ %& '( ! %& '( )
"
*+" , '
)- ....
-1 -
) 3 4 / &
0#0$100$
-
') & 2 ) 1 ') "
$3 1001 -
) 4 ) ) 5 6
rash and negligentdriving on the part of respondent No.1 while driving the offending vehicle bearing No.HR-16-GA-0295 (for short 'offending vehicle'), owned by respondent No.2, which was insured with respondent No.3.
3.
Claim petition No.19 of 2003 was instituted by Rameshwar owner of jeep bearing No. HR-16A-0522 seeking compensation on account of damage suffered by his vehicle due to rash and negligent driving on the part of respondent No.1 while driving the offending vehicle bearing No.HR-16-GA-0295 (for short 'offending vehicle'), owned by respondent No.2, which was insured with respondent No.3. 7 8 )
)+
!
"#$$
$" "$""$
No.HR-16-GA-0295 by Krishan Lal, respondent No.1?OPP (ii) Whether the petitioners are entitled to compensation, if so, to what amount and from whom?OPP
(iii) Whether respondent No.1 Krishan Kumar was not having a valid driving licence on the date of the accident, if so, to what effect? OPR No.3.
(iv) Relief.
5.
& 3 ) & )
/*30009+
) %'&"
$3 1001(
)
1$0009+ ) %'&"
/: 100#( ) :;) )
) < * 8 &) = , )
8>"
70=/ 100$ & ?'
- & ) : & -
@ )
) & ) @ & -,
"
/ "
/
- "
1 "
# - - !
- -"
+
! - -
"
/ @
/0 6 )
/*30009+
! ) ) 6 )
8
) - )
- 6 1191#- )
/1 ) /= "
)
A
- -, 2009(6) SCC 121 - Sarla Verma and others Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another, 10/*'B1*00
10/=%7( ' %'(### 5
$"$
%&& '(" !
"
// 6 -
) ) ) - ! A -
@ ! ) &! A ) 9
- ) -)>- )
1$0009+ )
1/*0009+ - )
/1 >
@ - & )
/# & ) C! D
- ?
D )'
100:%/( '
%'(=3*% '(2 #
$
% $
)
) & ! & A
E ! F
& ) ) "
)
)
& ) -
) ,
*
- ) )
A
- ) , ) -) - -
) @
-
+ ) /7 & '$()*+,)++- . "
,$/ -0,)++)12 /$ ) )- 1191#-
)?
-
*0009+) & ) ) ) -G+1 ) ?
+ A) )
- ) )
)+ A
&&
) - ) "
1/ ) -
-
/1009+) - )
17009+ ) $0; )
A ) -
-
/1009+) & 10/01001&
!@ ) -
))
) - )
- )
#0009+ ) /3 & 1191#-
- & 70;) ) - )
3
% ( )
71009+) %
#000H/1009+( /* & - ) ?
3 % ( )
- A
) $0; )
A
3
% ( ) ) -
- )
1/009+
- ) &) 27 &)2 7
)
/= 1191#- ) /=
3
% ( - )
- ) &) 2 2*7 &) 27
)
/: , ) "
1%) (
) &)627
&) 27
) &) 27
&) 27 A
3
% (6 ) "
/
) &) 27
)
% ( "
% ( &) 2*2*7 &) 2 2*7 &) 27)
10 - 9)
+ S.No .
Under Head Compensation awarded by the High Court 1.
Monthly income of deceased Rs.3000/- per month 2.
Age of deceased 23 years 3.
Future prospects @ 40% Rs.1,200/- 4.
Total income Rs.4,200/- per month 5.
Number of dependent 6.
Deduction towards personal expenses of the deceased 1/2 Rs.2,100/- (50%) * -
-
1/009+ 8.
Annual loss of dependency Rs.25,200/- (Rs.2,100 × 12) 9.
Multiplier 10.
Compensation on account of Loss of dependency
7$#3009+ %
1$1009+A/=( 11.
Compensation under conventional heads to claimant No.2- mother Rs.70,000/- 12.
Consortium to claimant No.1 for loss of filial consortium Rs.40,000/- 13.
Total Compensation
$3#3009+
14.
Interest 9% 1/
-
&) 2*2*7 ) &)262*7 &) 2*2*7 :
&) 26*272 &)227)
11 & '$ 4+56 , )++-
7 "
,$/6*, )++(12 1# & ) - )
!"
?
+/3+0$11 ) @ ) ! - ) @ )
1/*0009+ & ) ) -
) + ) G+/ I
+ A) ! -) )
1#$0009+ ) -/::3? A)G+#I )
JAG+#9 )
1/*0009+ ) ! ?
+A) ) -
-)? ) - - ) ) ?
?)
17 & & )
) -/::3?
-) A )
! - - K ) -
A ) - - -& & - ) )
1$0009+ )
) ! "
?
+/3+0$11 1$ ?
)- - &
&)
) ) 8, "
/*3 10/01001 1*:##*#07+ ,' 2 5I 2
!
! & ! @
!) -) !, )
) !)
A ) & ) G+# )
1/*0009+
- -G+# )
-)
- )
-
)
, ) ) ) )
*$0009+
! - )
*$0009+ ) ! -
"
1 ) "
/:9100# -) ) )
*$0009+ )
! 13
- -
9) ) &)6 27
& ) &) 27 &)6 2 :
&) 2) 1*
-
") "# &)227
- &
:;) ) ) #0//1001 < - - "
/ #!
- - > )
700009+ ) ) ) "
1+) 1= , ")
"# 2 ) &) 27 4 :;) ) ) #0//1001 < - - "
/ #!
- - 1:
- ) -
, '
)- )
- ?
D )'
G %'("
$#7 1010 #88$9
&
!,
/30#101/, '
)- )-
' %8( !) #0 ) % ( -
#/
- -1 -
#00#1013 $ G 9
L 9"
G
L 9"