← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/25591/2024allowed

Apeel @ Appeal And Others v. State Of Punjab And Another

2024-09-18Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry2 pages

CRM-M-25591-2024 (O&M) -1- 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25591-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 18.09.2024 



 ....Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :

Mr. Barjinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Adesh Pal Singh, AAG Punjab.

     ***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR (Annexure P1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/settlement dated 10.05.2024 (Annexure P-2) executed between the parties. Details of the FIR are as follows: FIR No.

Dated Sections Police Station 18.03.2024 323, 341, 506, 148, 149 IPC;

(307 and 427 IPC added later on) Dera Bassi, District SAS Nagar 2.

With the intervention of respectables and elderly people of the society, the parties have arrived at a settlement vide compromise deed dated 10.05.2024 (Annexure P-2), which is duly signed by them. The matter was referred to the Court below for recording of statements of the parties and to report with respect to genuineness of the compromise arrived at between the SANDAL SHARMA 2024.09.25 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-25591-2024 (O&M) -2-  parties. The !"# #$%#&#$ '# vide report dated 11.09.2024 has apprised this Court that the compromise arrived at between the parties is genuine and without any pressure. The petitioners have also deposited the cost of Rs.20,000/- in compliance to the order dated 29.08.2024.

3.

Respondent No.2 is represented by his counsel and does not oppose the compromise.

4.

In view of the aforesaid report of the !"# #$%#&# $, Dera Bassi and in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another", 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and "Narinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another", (2014) 6 SCC 466, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose can be served by keeping the criminal proceedings pending, since the complainant has himself compromised the dispute with the petitioners/ accused persons. 5.

In the circumstances, the present petition is allowed. FIR No.90 dated 18.03.2024 under Sections 323, 341, 506, 148, 149 IPC; (307 and 427 IPC added later on) of IPC registered at Police Station Dera Bassi, District SAS Nagar (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed on the basis of compromise qua the present petitioners.

(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 18.09.2024 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?

Yes/No SANDAL SHARMA 2024.09.25 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment