Om Parkash v. Ramesh Kumar Sharma And ANR

CRR No.1102 of 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.1102 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.07.2022 Om Parkash

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

Ramesh Kumar Sharma & another

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate for respondent no.1.

Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after dismissal of his appeal by the Sessions Court, the petitioner has undergone custody for more than one month and after that, the matter was settled in the Mediation and Conciliation Centre and the statements of the parties to this effect were also recorded. Given above, the present revision petition is dismissed. However, sentence of the petitioner is reduced to the period already undergone by him. Bail bonds of the petitioner are discharged. Fine and compensation deposited by the petitioner, if any, shall be refunded to the complainant, on an application moved on his behalf.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE July 29, 2022 AK Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.08.01 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original