Rohtas v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CM-9220-2020 in/and CWP-13125-2020 Date of decision: 22.09.2020 ROHTAS ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK PURI

Present:

Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** (The case has been taken up through video conferencing on account of Covid-19 Pandemic).

VIVEK PURI,J. (ORAL) CM-9220-2020 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The copy of order dated 17.08.2020 (Annexure P-6) is taken on record. The application is allowed.

CWP-13125-2020 The petitioner is aggrieved by the transfer order dated 17.08.2020 (Annexure P-6) vide which he has been transferred from Gurugram to Karnal. As per the transfer policy the employees are at liberty to make representation to the department in any manner aggrieved by the transfer order. It has been stated that the representation dated 20.08.2020 (Annexure P-7) (stated to be wrongly typed as 20.03.2020) has already been submitted to respondent No.3 but no action has been initiated thereupon. Notice of motion.

Mr. Amrik Singh Narwal, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and states that the appropriate decision on the aforesaid RENU BALA 2020.09.23 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CM-9220-2020 in/and -2CWP-13125-2020 representation (if submitted subsequent to the issuance of the transfer order) shall be taken within a period of 15 days.

Without making any further observations with regard to the genuineness of the allegations, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to look into the grievance of the petitioner as projected through the representation dated 20.08.2020 (Annexure P-7) in accordance with law. 22.09.2020 (VIVEK PURI) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No RENU BALA 2020.09.23 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document