High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/5579/2017disposed of

Yogita And ANR. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

2017-02-17Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-5579-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-5579 of 2017 Date of decision : February 17, 2017 Yogita and another ... Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Petitioners in person with Ms. Harpinder Kaur Sandhu, Advocate.

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 to 6.

Additional affidavit of petitioner no. 2-Vishal Moun produced by learned counsel of petitioners is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 16.02.2017 (Annexure P-4) made by the petitioners. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner No.1-Yogita is 17.11.1998 as per copy of Secondary School Examination Certificate (Annexure P-1) and that of petitioner No.2-Vishal Moun is 07.04.1997 as per copy of Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-2). They got married on 16.10.2016. Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-3. In view of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No. 2Jitender Kumar 2017.02.18 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-5579-2017 -2Superintendent of Police, Kaithal to look into the representation dated 16.02.2017 (Annexure P-4) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office. However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them. (SURINDER GUPTA) February 17, 2017.

JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.02.18 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH