Rahul v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-51684-2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-51684-2018 Date of decision: 29.11.2018 Rahul ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Vijay Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Through this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, in case FIR No. 66 dated 11.02.20108, registered under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station City Narnaul, District Mahendergarh.

The petitioner is facing trial in the aforesaid FIR. According to the prosecution, the petitioner fired upon injured-Mohit, with an intention to kill him.

Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioner is the main accused. Material prosecution witnesses have fully supported the prosecution story. The bullet fired by the petitioner crossed through the RISHU KATARIA 2018.12.03 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-51684-2018 -2nose of injured and the same had to be taken out by conducing major operation of his ear.

In view of the above and considering the gravity of offence committed by the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner does not deserve the concession of regular bail. Dismissed.

November 29, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2018.12.03 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document