Anil Kumar Mathur v. State Of Hry. And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9160-2007 Date of decision: 23.09.2024 Anil Kumar Mathur

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *****

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana.

***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dated 15.03.2007, whereby the petitioner was prematurely retired, at the age of 55 years and stay had been declined by passing a detailed order dated 15.06.2007, might not, due to efflux of time, even be surviving. 2.

Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises.

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 23.09.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No HAMANT 2024.09.24 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment