Ram Dev v. Satish Kumar Jain And ANR

224 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-485-2013 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION:-13.03.2023 Ram Dev

...Petitioner.

Vs.

Satish Kumar and another

...Respondents..

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:

Ms. Neha Anand Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Amit Shukla, AAG, Punjab, for respondent No.2-State.

**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has unfortunately expired, thereby, rendering the present petition as infructuous. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

13.03.2023 (HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No whether reportable:

Yes/No SONIKA 2023.03.13 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document