← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/30386/2021allowed

Abhinav Kumar Alias Lovely v. State Of Haryana And Another

2023-02-09Mr. Justice Gurbir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30386 of 2021 Date of Decision: 09.02.2023 ABHINAV KUMAR ALIAS LOVELY .... Petitioner versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURBIR SINGH

Present:

Mr. Rakshak Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gurpreet Singh Shergill, AAG, Punjab.

Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate for Ms. Rosi, Advocate for the respondent No.2.

***** GURBIR SINGH, J (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of an FIR No.95, dated 18.05.2021 under Sections 380 of IPC, registered at Police Station Julana, District Jind and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise deed dated 15.07.2021 effected between the parties.

Learned counsel for the parties have stated that the present FIR may be quashed as the parties have amicably settled the dispute. During the course of preliminary hearing, the trial Court was directed to record the statements of all the concerned parties, with regard to the genuineness and validity or otherwise of the compromise by this Court. RAMAN KUMAR 2023.02.10 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-30386 of 2021 -2In compliance thereof, report from the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jind has been received through the District & Sessions Judge, Jind, with statements of the parties, in which, it has been mentioned that the compromise is genuine and valid and outcome of free consent of the parties and is without coercion from any quarter.

The powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in "Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another",

(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and "Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another", 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543.

In view of the aforesaid report of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class Jind accompanied by statement of both the parties, the instant petition is allowed. Consequently, the FIR No.95, dated 18.05.2021 under Sections 380 of IPC, registered at Police Station Julana, District Jind and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, on the basis of compromise dated 15.07.2021, qua the petitioner only. (GURBIR SINGH) 09.02.2023 JUDGE Raman Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No RAMAN KUMAR 2023.02.10 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document