Jagdeep Singh @ Jagga v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-52268-2018 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-52268-2018 Date of Decision: 01.03.2019 Jagdeep Singh @ Jagga .... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Mr. Dhawaljeet Dutta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Davinder Bir Singh, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the complainant. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for complainant-Rachhpal Singh, has filed Vakalatnama, on his own, though he has not been impleaded as party. The same is taken on record. Office to tag the same at the appropriate place.

Through this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., petitionerJagdeep Singh @ Jagga, has prayed for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 41 dated 26.03.2018 registered under Sections 307, 452, 427 and 148 read with Section 149 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act at Police Station Fatehgarh Churian, District Gurdaspur. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been compromised in between the parties and separate petition for quashing of impugned FIR, would be filed very shortly. Learned counsel for the complainant fairly conceded that the RISHU KATARIA 2019.03.02 13:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-52268-2018 -2matter has been compromised in between the parties. He has no objection, if, the instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is released on bail.

Considering overall facts and circumstances, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed. Consequently, petitioner-Jagdeep Singh @ Jagga, is ordered to be released on bail pending trial, on his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. March 01, 2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2019.03.02 13:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document