Parul Rani And Another v. State Of Haryana & Others
Crl. Misc. No.M- 6228 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M- 6228 of 2017 Date of decision : 23.2.2017.
Parul Rani and another ... Petitioners
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Petitioners in person with Mr. Rajiv Kumar Saini, Advocate.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 to 9, parents and relatives of petitioner No.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 22.02.2017 (Annexure P-5) made by the petitioners. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner No.1-Parul Rani is 01.06.1998 as per copy of aadhar card (Annexure P-1) and that of petitioner No.2-Vinod Pal is 01.01.1993 as per copy of aadhar card (Annexure P-2). They got married on 21.02.2017. Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-4.
In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to Deepak Kumar 2017.02.23 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Crl. Misc. No.M- 6228 of 2017 -2respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Panipat to look into the representation dated 22.02.2017 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of certified copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them. February 23, 2017 (SURINDER GUPTA) deepak JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No Deepak Kumar 2017.02.23 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document