Mayank Joshi And ORS v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 13018 of 2020 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 16.09.2020 Mayank Joshi and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present :

Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Ms. Mamta Talwar, DAG, Haryana.

(Presence marked through video conference).

ARUN MONGA, J.(ORAL) The petitioners have approached under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing Advertisement dated 18.08.2020 (Annexure P-4), vide which the respondents wants to replace contractual employees with another set of contractual employees. Further prayer has been made to allow the petitioners to continue working on his post till regular selection is made. 2.

Learned State counsel, at the very outset, submits that she has filed a report wherein it is stated that the petitioners are still working on their present posts and they have and will not been replaced by another contractual set of employees.

3.

In the premise, in view of the report submitted by learned State counsel, the present petition is rendered infructuous. SONU 2020.09.17 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

4.

The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, the petitioners are at liberty to approach this Court again in case the aforesaid report is defied at later stage. SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 (ARUN MONGA) shalini JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SONU 2020.09.17 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document