M.K Mittal v. Amit Kumar Agrawal

E HIGH COURT OF PUNJ IN THE JAB AND HARYANA ARH COCP-1794-2024 Decision: October 24, 2024 AT CHANDIGA Date of D ........Petitioner M.K MITTAL AMIT KUMAR CORAM: HO

Present:

M M M M

Versus

R AGRAWAL ........Respondent ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARK KESH MANUJA Mr. D.R. Bansal, Advocate for t the petitioner.

Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advoca Ms. Baani Chhibber Mahajan, A e with ate for Advocate for respondent.

**** ANUJA, J. (ORAL) HARKESH MA Le earned counsel for responde ent submits that order dated d 14.09.2023 ha as now been complied with by y passing a speaking order.

In view of the aforesaid, learn ed counsel for the petitioner r does not pres ss the present petition, howe ever, with liberty to challenge e the same in ac ccordance with law Dis smissed as not pressed with a aforesaid liberty.

Ru ule discharged.

24.10.2024 Tejwinder Whether speaking/reasone (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE ed Yes/No Yes/No Whether Reportable TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.10.25 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document