Vinod Kholi v. State Of Haryana And Another

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-23959 of 2019 Date of Decision: 24.05.2019 Vinod Kohli ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and Another ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shekher Dhawan.

Present:

Mr. Simranjeet Singh Sarwara, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Shekher Dhawan, J.

Present petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for seeking pre-arrest bail to the petitioner(s) in case FIR No. 249 dated 28.02.2019, registered under Section(s) 174-A IPC at Police Station Jagadhri City, District Yamuna Nagar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that originally the case was instituted on the basis of complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, wherein the petitioner surrendered before the learned trial Court and was admitted to bail. However, present FIR was registered against the petitioner because of his continuous default in appearance and issuance of proclamation. As such, no case is made out to grant the concession of prearrest bail to the petitioner, at this stage and petition stands dismissed. However, in case petitioner surrenders before the learned trial Court within a period of one week from today and moves an application for granting him DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2019.05.24 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M-23959 of 2019 bail, the same shall be decided by the learned trial Judge within a period of three days thereafter.

(Shekher Dhawan) Judge May 24, 2019 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2019.05.24 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document