High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/6333/2017disposed of

Yogesh v. State Of Haryana

2017-05-09Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-6333 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : May 09, 2017 Yogesh ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) CRM-14064-2017 Learned State counsel submits that he does not want to file reply to the present application and has no objection if the same is allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the course of investigations, offences under sections 409, 120-B IPC have been added.

In the light of the aforesaid, the present application is allowed. Registry to make necessary addition in the head note of the main petition. CRM-M-6333-2017 The allegations against petitioner Yogesh in this regular bail application under section 439 Cr.P.C. are that around 22.1.2017 he was instrumental in diverting the Urea which was meant to be supplied at subsidized rates, in the open market at higher price. Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2017.05.12 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-6333 of 2017 (O&M) -2The contentions of the counsel for the petitioner are that the petitioner is in custody since 22.1.2017 and that the trial is not likely to be concluded in the near future. On behalf of the State the bail is sought to be opposed vehemently on the ground that the petitioner has committed offence which has social repercussions.

Keeping in view the substantive period of incarceration and the fact that the trial is not likely to be concluded in near future, without adverting to the merits of the case, the instant application is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Jhajjar.

The present petition stands disposed off accordingly. The observations made herein above shall not be binding on the trial court at the time of trial as these are purely for the disposal of the present bail application.

( Fateh Deep Singh ) May 09, 2017 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2017.05.12 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.