← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/52466/2018allowed

Gurjit Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another

2022-08-02Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj8 pages



       



 GURJIT SINGH @ HAPPY     "   STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

#   $   %&$  '( '  ) 

      

  



  

! "  



  

#$ %%%%% ( '  )  * "+,  & '( ) 

 

 

  

 

*      

 +,$    *   *

!    &-./ 0 

         1**23 

"   "

4

  56 # 7&.-   7$&$$7&.     

 +$7 +89 +8,+.& &$7:'  6  !* &,870 

    

   16*23 

    !

  

!  ;

 5 <  0

=  :&3   !!    

4

!  

 

   )

))

  &7&7$7&,0

= :$3

 

>

-2- $ ? 

>          !  * @6!!4

     $,&&$7&,

*

   

 ))

  

>

  

 > !!  /  

   

   ) A ! 

 5

 *!

 5 <      ) # &+,-  &,&$$7&,?  ! 

 =     

      :  



    

    



                



     

 !

     "   #

  

          $

  



    % 

   

 &'&&()&'   !

*!  "

! +     ,    

    

  



      



         

  

%  !



 

 !            

     

 

 !

        

   #()&(()&'  -          

 .&()&/     

           

        

   0

-3- + B     

!   

    )  ))

)

     

  !

 

 )

9  

! "       !  

#$ 

! )

 

    56 !!    

4

! 

4   8 ? 5!!'



*





     

              

 

!

""

 #

$%



    

*('$   

!



  



 

  !

  !

 

!

,       

 '(

,",$

  

 !

 

 

!

 



     2     ! 

   , 22  

   2 (/ 3 & '

(

  '

& '

 

   ) '* *!  4  3  5     

       

 6 $

     %    

     



 !



 

    0 .)$

    

  

%   

          3     !

  !             

  1  

       

    

 ,   !

          

   

  %    

-4-  

 7   

     .&8 !

!





 .()/

,", 

        

 

 '(

,", .($

     

 9  

    !

% 3  

  

  

  

 '(

,",   

         



       

   2      2:  

  

  -  

        

 

 

 

   !

 ,  !     

 '(

,",

    ! 

      

           $

     !

        !

          

!                 

           

       .. $

   % !   

!% 

  !



,",  

 

 

      ,  

  '( 



      !

       

, 



    9

 

   -  ! 

   

 !

 

  .()

,",     

!      

    . $

  

  '( 

 ,",   !

 ;1-:

!  5        !       ,  $

   

 !

 %    

-5- 

 -

  !    ,   %7  

  

   3   

 

     

   $

   

 '(

,",

  

 ,                  $

    

  !

           $

 ,    %

1  - 

 %           $

,         %



 -       <     !   

     

    

 

  

    ,     



%  % 

  

                   

    . ?  ! ! 

!

   !  >   4

  )

>  !

   C !  ) *

'Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another,(2012)10 SCC303'. Still further, the broad principles for exercising the powers under Section 482 were summarized by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of Gujarat and another" (2017) 9 SCC 641'. 8.

 

 >  )  !  !

 )

  

  !   >!   



     

 ?           

" !( >

 

)        

-6- - ?  C !   )  *     !

  )

  D"# + , , -

 &    *

$



)

.!/0

>    <   

  

  )

 >    



   =

! 

())

       

 4

  >  >!      

  *   4   56

 >

! )

   )

? 



 C !  ) *

 =      :

19. We thus sum-up and hold that as opposed to Section 320 Cr.P.C. where the Court is squarely guided by the compromise between the parties in respect of offences 'compoundable' within the statutory framework, the extraordinary power enjoined upon a High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution, can be invoked beyond the metes and bounds of Section 320 Cr.P.C. Nonetheless, we reiterate that such powers of wide amplitude ought to be exercised carefully in the context of quashing criminal proceedings, bearing in mind: (i) Nature and effect of the offence on the conscious of the society; (ii) Seriousness of the injury, if any; (iii) Voluntary nature of compromise between the accused and the victim; & (iv) Conduct of the accused persons, prior to and after the occurrence of the purported offence and/or other relevant considerations.

&7 ? !!>

 ! 

   )  )  !     > !!

4

  !)

! )

    



 >     

+,$** :

3  ?  > 

   )

(



>

 

-7-

3  ? 

/.(    





 

 > !!       



 

 !

 > !!

>"! 

3  ? 

!!

   56> 

 

 ( $7&.

!!  



3  ?   

4





       >! "

  

  



(  ! 6  !

)  

"

 

   * E v)  *



     

   

  

   

! 

!

" !( :

  (!  

vi)  ?   

   !

" !(

 

(  >

  

     



#!   >!   (



  

E viii)  

   (

!

 

  

! 

 

! 

  (

   

 56 ix)  ?  )!

 !

" !(        

*



  

!

" !(  >

 

) ?  !>

> !!  >

 !         !!( : =

 !

 

) (

-811.

In view of the report of the A !

5

*!

5 < a  

!

! >   =*

1



-'

      $

$

 !! > !! "# +

, , -

 &   

$

 )

.!/ !

 5!!'



*





   

-'

     *

 !

""

 #

$%



!!> ?   FIR No. 0179 dated 02.12.2017 under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as "IPC") registered at Police Station Kulgari, District Ferozepur (Annexure P-1) and all other consequential proceedings arising there from"-"./01-4  

 >))

deed dated 10.10.2018 (Annexure P-2). However, the same would be subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited by the petitioner with the "High Court Bar Association Environment Protection Fund", within one month from receipt of certified copy of this order.



!!>        *( '  ),  ' 2         =

 F    "

@    G @# F    !   G @#