Raj Singh Alias Raju v. Municipal Corporation, Sonepat

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH (157) INCOMP-3114-2024 Date of Decision: 26.11.2024 Raj Singh .....Appellant

Versus

Municipal Corporation, Sonepat ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI

Present:

None.

**** VIKAS SURI , J. (Oral) 1.

The aforesaid matter was filed on 19.05.2023 by Shri Ketan Antil, Advocate. The Registry had raised objection on the case file on 21.06.2023.

2.

As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/ party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. In spite of SMS having been sent at the registered mobile, the same was not taken back for re-filing after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders.

3.

A note was published by the Registry in the cause list as well as on the website of the Court, whereby the advocates were requested to collect their cases lying with objections, which were filed upto 31.12.2023, for refiling after removal of objections. It was further notified that all pending cases of such nature will be listed before Court for appropriate orders. DIWAKER GULATI 2024.11.27 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

4.

Case has been listed in the urgent cause list for today. None has come present.

5.

Keeping in view the aforesaid factual matrix, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. 6.

Disposed of.

November 26, 2024 (VIKAS SURI) d.gulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No DIWAKER GULATI 2024.11.27 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document